Find the paths that matter.
Drive the fix.
Prove risk went down.
Built on Live Security Context: one live model of your environment, from the security tools you already run. Agentic where it helps. Bounded where it matters.
No one tool sees the path. So nobody works the path.
Your tools each see a piece. The attacker sees how the pieces connect.
Every tool is confident. None of them talk.
A score describes a vulnerability, not your environment.
A path crosses four tools. Every report stops at one.
You cannot close what nobody can see.
A closed ticket is a claim. Closure is a fact.
Unizo re-derives the path from the environment after the work is marked done. If the path is still there, the exposure stays open.
An attacker asks three questions.
Can I get in, and move? Is it worth it? Does my exploit work today?
Unizo asks the same three, continuously, of every exposure in your environment. The same model that answers them is what makes a re-check possible.
The path
The stakes
The threat
Answer one, and you have a guess. Answer all six, together and live, and you know.
That is Live Security Context.
From found to verified closed.
EXP-4821, followed end to end. And when it closes, the loop keeps running.
one row of thousands
reaches customer-db
C: both, sequenced
nothing runs until you do
evidence captured
Not one plan. The right plan.
Unizo's Exposure Analyst does the investigation you would do with ten more analysts and forty more hours. Every recommendation traces back to evidence from your environment.
It drafts. You approve. The owner applies it.
No rip-and-replace. Unizo runs on the stack you already have.
Unizo doesn't replace your tools or become another system to migrate onto. It connects them into one live view your team can reason over. The reach is broad; the commitment is light.
Plus HRIS, MDM, cloud IAM, CI/CD, code repositories, secrets managers, ticketing, and whatever else you already run. That reach includes the AI your teams run: agents, MCP servers and the credentials behind them, traced as paths like everything else.
If a system knows something about your assets, identities, access, or ownership, Unizo is built to read it.
The teams reducing the risk.
Vulnerability management
from CVE queues to the paths that matterIdentity security
how privilege turns an ordinary exposure into a real oneCloud security
assets, access, and reachable impact in one viewRemediation owners
work routed with its evidence, and the re-check that followsAnd for security leaders
Proof that risk went down, not a record of activity.
Where Unizo fits.
What category is this?
AI-native exposure management, in the CTEM family. Unizo reasons over your environment to find the exposure paths that can actually lead to compromise, drives the fix, and verifies closure against the environment. The category tells you where it sits. Verified closure is what makes it different.
How is this different from my vulnerability scanner?
A scanner tells you a flaw exists and ranks it by severity. Unizo reasons over whether that flaw sits on a route to something that matters, then drives the fix and confirms the route is gone. A high score describes a vulnerability. Unizo describes your environment.
Do you replace the tools we already run?
No. Unizo does not replace the tools you already run. It sits above your scanners, cloud security, identity, and ITSM and connects their signal into one live model. Nothing to rip out, nothing to migrate onto. The reach is broad; the commitment is light.
Is it autonomous? Will it change production on its own?
Agentic where it helps, bounded where it matters. Unizo drafts the remediation plan, routes it to the accountable owner, and tracks it through to verified closure. The owner applies the production change. Autonomy is tunable, and nothing moves outside the gates you set.
Pick one path. We'll trace it to closed.
A real exposure from your environment, taken from finding to verified closure. You see the evidence, not a deck.