Find the paths that matter.
Drive the fix.
Prove risk went down.
Built on Live Security Context: one live model of your environment, from the security tools you already run. Agentic where it helps. Bounded where it matters.
You don't have a findings problem. You have a reduction problem.
Your team closes tickets, meets SLAs, and works the queue. None of it tells you whether the environment is harder to attack than it was last quarter.
Every tool is confident. None of them talk.
A score describes a vulnerability, not your environment.
Closed in the ticket is not closed in the environment.
Ranking a list higher is not the same as reducing it.
Don't trust the path. Verify it.
Many tools see a piece. Some draw a path. Unizo verifies it's real, then follows it to closure.
An attacker asks three questions.
Can I get in, and move? Is it worth it? Does my exploit work today?
Unizo asks the same three, continuously, of every exposure in your environment.
Answer one, and you have a guess. Answer all six, together and live, and you know.
That is Live Security Context.
From found to verified closed.
EXP-4821, followed end to end. And when it closes, the loop keeps running.
one row of thousands
reaches customer-db
C: both, sequenced
nothing runs until you do
evidence captured
Not one plan. The right plan.
Unizo's AI exposure analyst does the investigation you would do with ten more analysts and forty more hours. Every recommendation traces back to evidence from your environment.
It drafts. You approve. It acts only then.
Done when the path is gone. Not when the ticket is.
A closed ticket is a claim. Unizo checks it against the environment, and proves it.
Closed paths reopen. A redeploy, a permission change, quiet drift. Unizo keeps checking.
No rip-and-replace. Unizo runs on the stack you already have.
Unizo doesn't replace your tools or become another system to migrate onto. It connects them into one live view your team can reason over. The reach is broad; the commitment is light.
Plus HRIS, MDM, cloud IAM, CI/CD, code repositories, secrets managers, ticketing, and whatever else you already run.
If a system knows something about your assets, identities, access, or ownership, Unizo is built to read it.
The teams doing the reduction.
Proof that risk went down, not a record of activity.
Where Unizo fits.
What category is this?
AI-native exposure management, in the CTEM family. Unizo reasons over your environment to find the exposure paths that can actually lead to compromise, drives the fix, and verifies the path is closed. The category tells you where it sits. Verified closure is what makes it different.
How is this different from my vulnerability scanner?
A scanner tells you a flaw exists and ranks it by severity. Unizo reasons over whether that flaw sits on a route to something that matters, then drives the fix and confirms the route is gone. A high score describes a vulnerability. Unizo describes your environment.
Do you replace the tools we already run?
No. Unizo does not replace the tools you already run. It sits above your scanners, cloud security, identity, and ITSM and connects their signal into one live model. Nothing to rip out, nothing to migrate onto. The reach is broad; the commitment is light.
Is it autonomous? Will it change production on its own?
Agentic where it helps, bounded where it matters. Unizo drafts the remediation plan and can execute through the gates you set. Autonomy is tunable, and nothing touches production until you approve it.
No booth.
No slides.
Come argue
with us.
We're off the show floor and in the room with you: a real exposure path, traced end to end in thirty minutes, founder-led. Bring your hardest question about why your last remediation didn't reduce anything.